Ex Parte Kemeny - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                      
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                            ________________                                                
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                            ________________                                                
                                    Ex parte EMANUEL S. KEMENY                                              
                                            ________________                                                
                                            Appeal 2007-1371                                                
                                          Application 10/326,103                                            
                                          Technology Center 1700                                            
                                            ________________                                                
                                          Decided:  May 14, 2007                                            
                                            ________________                                                
               Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and                                                   
               CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
               KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 15-17.  Claim 15 is              
               illustrative:                                                                                
               15.  A food bar snack which approximates and improves on the nutrition,                      
               flavor, and function of a corresponding course in a conventional meal, for an                
               individual consumer, comprising:                                                             



                                                                                                           



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013