The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte CAN ERKEY and HIROAKI S. HARA ________________ Appeal 2007-1375 Application 10/327,300 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: May 11, 2007 ________________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 33 and 34, which are the only claims pending in this application (see the Amendment accompanying the Reply Brief dated Sep. 28, 2006, entered as per the Communication from the Examiner dated Nov. 24, 2006). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013