The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NATALINO ZANCHETTA
and SHAIK MOHSEEN
____________
Appeal 2007-1382
Application 10/334,871
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: May 11, 2007
____________
Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, PETER F. KRATZ, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s rejection
of claims 1 through 14, which are the only claims pending in this
application. Although the action appealed from was a non-final rejection,
we have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134 since these claims
have been twice presented and rejected. See Ex parte Lemoine, 46 USPQ2d
1420, 1423 (Bd. Pat. App. & Int. 1994).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013