Ex Parte Zanchetta et al - Page 2

                   Appeal 2007-1382                                                                                                    
                   Application 10/334,871                                                                                              

                           According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a vapor retardant                                     
                   hybrid polyolefinic multi-laminate roof underlayment (Br. 5).  Further                                              
                   details of the invention may be gleaned from illustrative independent claim 1                                       
                   as reproduced below:                                                                                                
                           1. A vapor retardant underlayment for use in roofing applications                                           
                   comprising:                                                                                                         
                           a laminate having at least three layers,                                                                    
                           an upper layer of extruded film, the film being made of a material                                          
                   selected from the groups consisting of: high density polyethylene film and                                          
                   low density polyethylene film,                                                                                      
                           a middle layer of lightweight scrim,                                                                        
                           a bottom layer of spun bonded polypropylene fabric,                                                         
                           the middle layer being attached to said upper layer by a first adhesive                                     
                   layer, and the middle layer and the bottom layer being connected by a                                               
                   second adhesive layer.                                                                                              

                           The Examiner has relied upon the following references as evidence of                                        
                   obviousness:                                                                                                        
                   Wiercinski                                US 5,687,517                         Nov. 18, 1997                        
                   Ahluwalia                                 US 5,965,257                         Oct. 12, 1999                        
                   Huffines                                    US 2002/0106959 A1            Aug. 8, 2002                              
                   Hubbard                                    US 2003/0219564 A1            Nov. 27, 2003                              
                   Jones                                         US 2004/0016502 A1            Jan. 29, 2004                           
                                                     ISSUES ON APPEAL                                                                  
                           Claims 1-4, 6, 7, and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                                          
                   unpatentable over Jones in view of Wiercinski (Answer 3).                                                           


                                                                  2                                                                    

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013