The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte IBRAHIM BECHARA and ANATOLY LIPKIN ____________ Appeal 2007-1386 Application 10/439,922 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: August 15,2007 ____________ Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2, 4-8, and 14-27, the only claims pending in the application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM. The invention relates to preparation of polyurethane dispersions from fast reacting aromatic (MDI based) or aliphatic (HDI based) diisocyanates (Br. 8). According to Appellants, they have found that by modifying the lowPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013