Ex Parte Bechara et al - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1386                                                                             
                Application 10/439,922                                                                       

                free diisocyanate (LF) prepolymers with polyols containing pendent                           
                carboxyl, sulfonic, or polyoxyethylene moieties, it is possible to make                      
                dispersions which are free of organic solvents.  Claim 5 is illustrative of the              
                invention and is reproduced below:                                                           
                5. A stable aqueous polyurethane dispersion prepared by a process                            
                comprising subjecting a low free-diisocyanate polyurethane prepolymer                        
                modified by the addition of pendent anionic, cationic, or nonionic moieties                  
                to high shear mixing in the presence of a reaction retarder and water to form                
                a dispersion of said prepolymer, then extending said prepolymer to yield                     
                said stable aqueous polyurethane dispersion.                                                 
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art references to show                      
                unpatentability:                                                                             
                Dieterich US 4,276,044 Jun. 30, 1981                                                         
                Lorenz US 4,528,323 Jul. 9, 1985                                                             
                      The Examiner made the following rejection:                                             
                      Claims 2, 4-8, and 14-27 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over                    
                Lorenz in view of Dieterich.                                                                 
                                                   ISSUE                                                     
                      Based on the contentions of the Examiner and the Appellants, the                       
                issue before us is:  Has the Examiner made accurate and sufficient factual                   
                findings such that it is reasonable to conclude that one of ordinary skill in                
                the art would have been motivated to combine the teachings of the                            
                references in the manner claimed?  For the reasons discussed below, we                       
                answer this question in the affirmative.                                                     
                                    RELEVANT FINDINGS OF FACT                                                
                1) Lorenz discloses a “process for the preparation of aqueous                                
                   dispersions of polyurethanes containing chemically fixed carboxylate                      

                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013