Ex Parte Ilmonen - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1391                                                                             
                Application 10/875.047                                                                       
                                      STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      The subject matter on appeal is directed to a check valve seal for a                   
                metal injecting molding machine or die casting machine.  (Specification 1).                  
                The check valve seal “effectively seals the injection channel [of the valve] to              
                prevent the backflow of the molten metal into the supply cylinder [of the                    
                valve] during the injection stroke.”  (Specification 3).   The check valve seal              
                is a ring having a groove in its forward face, which upon receiving molten                   
                metal, forces an outer circumferential portion of the ring to expand in a                    
                radial direction to provide a seal between the ring and a molding machine.                   
                (Specification 4).  Further details of the appeal subject matter are recited in              
                representative claim 1 reproduced below:                                                     
                      1. A seal for a check valve of a molding machine, said seal                            
                comprising a ring having a rear surface engageable with a surface of said                    
                valve to block flow of injection material into an [sic, a] melt passageway and               
                a groove interior of a circumferential surface of said ring and extending from               
                a forward surface of said valve [sic, ring] toward said rear surface.                        

                      The Examiner has relied upon the following sole prior art reference as                 
                evidence of unpatentability:                                                                 
                Gatti    US 6,585,001 B2   Jul. 1, 2003                                                      
                      The Examiner has rejected claims 1 and 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                   
                anticipated by Gatti. (Answer 4).                                                            
                                                   ISSUE                                                     
                      Has the Examiner demonstrated that Gatti describes a groove interior                   
                of a circumferential surface of a seal ring extending from a forward surface                 
                of the valve toward the rear surface within the meaning of 35 U.S.C.                         
                § 102(b)?                                                                                    


                                                     2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013