Appeal 2007-1427
Application 09/826,240
the Examiner’s rejection of claims 26, 27, 35, 36, 39, and 40 as being
unpatentable over Mittal.
DECISION
We have sustained the Examiner’s rejection of all claims on appeal.
Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 21-40 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
rwk
HITT GAINES, PC
LSI Corporation
PO BOX 832570
RICHARDSON TX 75083
18
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Last modified: September 9, 2013