Ex Parte Heckmann et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte HANS HECKMANN, REINHARD WEIBERLE,                                          
                                 BERND KESCH, and PETER BLESSING                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1464                                                
                                          Application 10/276,285                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                         Decided: August 31, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
            Before TERRY J. OWENS, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,                                    
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                    
            HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013