Ex Parte Tsukada et al - Page 2


               Appeal 2007-1485                                                                             
               Application 10/943,944                                                                       
                      According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a wide                          
               fluororesin film having a width of from 1 to 150 m having at least two sheets                
               of film made from a fluororesin.  The fluororesin film has utility as a                      
               covering material for agricultural uses (Specification 5-9).2  Claim 13 is                   
               representative of the invention and is reproduced below:                                     
               13.  A wide fluororesin film having a width of from 1 to 150 m, having at                    
                      least two sheets of films made from a fluororesin, bonded by repeating                
                      a bonding method at least once, wherein the bonding method                            
                      comprises disposing said at least two sheets of films so that their                   
                      edges overlap each other, thereby forming an overlapping portion,                     
                      wherein said overlapping portion includes and is wider than a central                 
                      part thereof, press-bonding said central part of said overlapping                     
                      portion under heating at a temperature within a range of from lower                   
                      by 5°C to higher by 20°C than the melting point of the fluororesin,                   
                      and then press-bonding the entire area of said overlapping portion at a               
                      temperature within a range of from lower by 30°C to lower by more                     
                      than 5°C, than the melting point, to weld the two sheets of films.                    

                      The Examiner has relied on the following prior art references as                      
               evidence of unpatentability:                                                                 
               Jarvis    US 2002/0172792   Nov. 21, 2002                                                    
               Higuchi   US 6,512,064 B2   Jan. 28, 2003                                                    
               Lankhof   US 6,706,946 B1   Mar. 16, 2004                                                    
               Yamanaka3   US 6,878,400 B1   Apr. 12, 2005                                                  
               Inaba4    US 6,893,729 B2   May 17,                                                          
               2005                                                                                         

                      The Examiner entered the following grounds of rejection:                              
                                                                                                           
               2 We refer to and cite from Appellants’ Appeal Brief dated July 24, 2006 and                 
               the Reply Brief dated October 19, 2006.                                                      
               3 The application for this patent was filed on November 13, 2001.                            
               4 The application for this patent was filed on November 1, 2002.                             

                                                     2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013