The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES ARMAND BALDWIN
and PETER T. BARRETT
____________
Appeal 2007-1492
Application 10/061,813
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: July 27, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, and
JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Baldwin and Barrett (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the Examiner's final rejection of claims 4, 9, 14 through 16, 18, 21, and 24,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
Appellants' invention relates to the structuring of program data prior
to delivery to a client's electronic program guide for easier searching by the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013