The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ANDREJ KOCEV, SAMUEL H. DUNCAN, and STEVEN HO
____________
Appeal 2007-1498
Application 09/944,776
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: September 7, 2007
____________
Before ROBERT E. NAPPI, JEAN R. HOMERE, and
ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 13 through 36, 40, and 41. Claims 37 through 39 have
been allowed. Claims 1 through 12 have been cancelled. We have
jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013