The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte AN FENG1
_____________
Appeal 2007-1505
Application 10/279,481
Technology Center 2100
______________
Decided: July 27, 2007
_______________
Before FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,
ALLEN R. MacDONALD, and ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) of the Final
Rejection of claims 1 through 9, 11, 16, and 17, claims 12 through 15 are
objected to and claims 10 and 18 have been canceled. Appellant has
1 We note that declaration and official filing receipt identify the inventor as
An Feng, however Appellant’s Brief and Reply Brief, both identify the
inventor as Andrew Feng.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013