Appeal 2007-1522
Application 10/631,698
chelating agent, such as EDTA, in a chemical-mechanical polishing
composition of the type disclosed by Chamberlin.
As a final point, we note that Appellants base no argument upon
objective evidence of nonobviousness which would serve to rebut the
inference of obviousness established by the Examiner.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well stated by
the Examiner, the Examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is
affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
clj
Fennemore Craig, P.C.
1700 Lincoln St.
Suite 2625
Denver, CO 80203
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013