Ex Parte Maheshwari et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                       
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                            ________________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                            ________________                                                  
                          Ex parte PEEYUSH MAHESHWARI, MARY J. REED,                                          
                             THOMAS CRAIG HOESE, ESSAM WAHBAH,                                                
                               NICHOLAS D. KOVICH, HEIDI L. NELSON                                            
                                        and JAMES N. WEINSTEIN                                                
                                            ________________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1528                                                 
                                          Application 10/360,991                                              
                                          Technology Center 1700                                              
                                            ________________                                                  
                                          Decided:  May 16, 2007                                              
                                            ________________                                                  
                Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, PETER F. KRATZ, and                                                  
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                              
                KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-7, 9, and 32.                    
                Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                      
                      1. A microwaveable dough product containing a filling, said                             
                product comprising:                                                                           

                                                                                                             



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013