The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________________ Ex parte SHIVNANDAN D. KAUSHIK, BRYANT BIGBEE, AND CHRIS NEWBURN ____________________ Appeal 2007-1541 Application 10/334,6951 Technology Center 2100 ____________________ Decided: September 25, 2007 ____________________ Before JAMES D. THOMAS, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and MARC S. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judges. HOFF, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF CASE Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a Final Rejection of claims 1-20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm. 1 Application filed December 30, 2002. The real party in interest is Intel Corporation.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013