Appeal 2007-1541 Application 10/334,695 CONCLUSION OF LAW We conclude that Appellants have not shown that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-20. Claims 1-20 are not patentable. DECISION The Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-20 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED KIS SCHWEGMAN, LUNDBERG & WOESSNER, P.A. P. O. BOX 2938 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 12Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Last modified: September 9, 2013