Appeal 2007-1552
Application 09/852,123
CONCLUSION
We conclude that Appellants have not shown that the Examiner erred in
rejecting claim 1 as anticipated by Avery, claims 2-5 as unpatentable over Avery
and Smith, claim 6 as unpatentable over Avery, Smith, and Li, and claims 7-12 as
unpatentable over Avery, Smith, Li, and Wong.
DECISION AND ORDER
The Examiner’s decision under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) to reject claim 1 as
anticipated by Avery is affirmed. The Examiner’s decision under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) to reject claims 2-5 as unpatentable over Avery and Smith, claim 6 as
unpatentable over Avery, Smith, and Li, and claims 7-12 as unpatentable over
Avery, Smith, Li, and Wong is affirmed.
AFFIRMED
vsh
O'SHEA, GETZ & KOSAKOWSKI, P.C.
1500 MAIN ST.
SUITE 912
SPRINGFIELD MA 01115
13
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Last modified: September 9, 2013