Appeal 2007-1555 Application 09/900,442 We sustain the rejection of claims 1-3 and 8-13 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Headrick in view of Fehr, Hellstrom, and Snyder. We sustain the rejection of claims 4-7 and 40-44 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Headrick in view of Fehr, Hellstrom, and Snyder as applied to claims 1-3 and 8-13 above, and further in view of Taber. We sustain the rejection of claims 14 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Headrick in view of Fehr, Hellstrom, and Snyder as applied to claims 1-3 and 8-13. We sustain the rejection of claims 47 and 48 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Headrick in view of Fehr, Hellstrom, and Kurtz. DECISION The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-15, 40-44, 47, and 48 over the prior art is AFFIRMED. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006). AFFIRMED jlb KEATS A. QUINALTY WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE P.O. BOX 7037 ATLANTA GA 30357-0037 14Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Last modified: September 9, 2013