Appeal 2007-1557 Application 10/943,536 capacitively stores electrical energy and provides the stored electrical energy as the DC supply voltage in an absence of the main supply source, the electrical energy provided by the electrical energy back-up system used for a commanded braking operation of the aircraft; wherein the supply of capacitively stored electrical energy from the electrical energy back-up system is made without switching between the electrical energy back-up system and the main supply source. THE REJECTIONS The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence of unpatentability: Fangio US 5,744,876 Apr. 28, 1998 Corio US 6,296,325 B1 Oct. 2, 2001 The following rejections are before us for review: 1. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention. 2. Claims 1-13 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Corio in view of Fangio. ISSUE The issues before us are whether Appellant has shown that the Examiner erred in rejecting (1) claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013