Appeal 2007-1557
Application 10/943,536
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that Appellant has shown that the Examiner erred in rejecting
claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, but has not shown that the
Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
DECISION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph, is reversed. The decision of the Examiner to reject claim 1-13
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this
appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). See 37 C.F.R.
§ 1.136(a)(1)(iv) (2006).
AFFIRMED
vsh:
MARK D. SARALINO (GENERAL)
RENNER, OTTO, BOISSELLE & SKLAR, LLP
1621 EUCLID AVENUE, NINETEENTH FLOOR
CLEVELAND OH 44115-2191
15
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: September 9, 2013