Ex Parte Falke - Page 8



            Appeal 2007-1558                                                                               
            Application 10/635,362                                                                         
                  29. An inscription is something that is inscribed. Merriam-Webster’s                     
            Collegiate Dictionary 646 (11th ed. 2005)                                                      
                  30. To inscribe is to write, engrave, or print as a lasting record. Merriam-             
            Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary 646 (11th ed. 2005)                                            

                                         PRINCIPLES OF LAW                                                 
                  The test for definiteness under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is                    
            whether “those skilled in the art would understand what is claimed when the claim              
            is read in light of the specification.”  Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs,          
            Inc., 806 F.2d 1565, 1576, 1 USPQ2d 1081, 1088 (Fed. Cir. 1986).                               
                  The Examiner bears the initial burden of presenting a prima facie case of                
            obviousness in rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  See In re Rijckaert,                   
            9 F.3d 1531, 1532, 28 USPQ2d 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir. 1993).                                      
                  In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, it is incumbent upon the                      
            Examiner to establish a factual basis to support the legal conclusion of                       
            obviousness.  See In re Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 1073, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed.                   
            Cir. 1988).  In so doing, the Examiner must make the factual determinations set                
            forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17, 148 USPQ 459, 467 (1966),                   
            viz., (1) the scope and content of the prior art; (2) the differences between the prior        
            art and the claims at issue; and (3) the level of ordinary skill in the art.  “[T]he           
            examiner bears the initial burden, on review of the prior art or on any other ground,          
            of presenting a prima facie case of unpatentability.”  In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443,           
            1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992).  Furthermore, “‘there must be                     

                                                    8                                                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013