The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte STEFAN FOKKEN and WALTHER REITH __________ Appeal 2007-1565 Application 10/682,951 Technology Center 1700 __________ DECIDED: May 16, 2007 __________ Before TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC GRIMES, and RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-5. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm. STATEMENT OF CASE The claimed invention relates to a composition for stabilizing halogen containing polymers (Specification 3). Claims 1-5, all the pending claims, stand rejected over prior art (Br. 1). The Examiner relies on the following evidence of unpatentability:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013