1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
2 not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
6 _____________
7
8 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
9 AND INTERFERENCES
10 _____________
11
12 Ex parte MARK A. SAAB
13 _____________
14
15 Appeal No. 2007-1580
16 Application No. 11/017,710
17 Technology Center 3700
18 ______________
19
20 Decided: July 27, 2007
21 _______________
22
22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, HUBERT C. LORIN, and JENNIFER D. BAHR,
23
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25
25 PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28
29 DECISION ON APPEAL
30
31
32 STATEMENT OF THE CASE
33 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 74 and 75. The
34 other claims in the application, viz., claims 1-73, have been cancelled. We have
35 jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134 and 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013