Ex Parte Saab - Page 3

            Appeal 2007-1580                                                                                 
            Application 11/017,710                                                                           

        1   Eli Lilly and Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1566, 43 USPQ2d 1398, 1404 (Fed. Cir. 1997),                   
        2   cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1089 (1998)(citing Vas-Cath Inc. v. Mahurkar, 935 F.2d                    
        3   1555, 1563, 19 USPQ2d 1111, 1116 (Fed. Cir. 1991)).  To fulfill the written                      
        4   description requirement, a patent specification must describe an invention and do                
        5   so in sufficient detail that one skilled in the art can clearly conclude that “the               
        6   inventor invented the claimed invention.”  Id. (citing Lockwood v. Am.  Airlines,                
        7   Inc., 107 F.3d 1565, 1572, 41 USPQ2d 1961, 1966 (1997) and In re Gosteli, 872                    
        8   F.2d 1008, 1012, 10 USPQ2d 1614, 1618 (Fed. Cir. 1989) (“[T]he description                       
        9   must clearly allow persons of ordinary skill in the art to recognize that [the                   
       10   inventor] invented what is claimed.”)).  Thus, an applicant complies with the                    
       11   written description requirement “by describing the invention, with all its claimed               
       12   limitations, not that which makes it obvious,” and by using “such descriptive                    
       13   means as words, structures, figures, diagrams, formulas, etc., that set forth the                
       14   claimed invention.”  Id. (citing Lockwood, 107 F.3d at 1572, 41 USPQ2d at 1966).                 
       15          It is important to note that "[t]he invention is, for purposes of the ‘written            
       16   description’ inquiry, whatever is now claimed.”  Vas-Cath, 935 F.2d at 1564, 19                  
       17   USPQ2d at 1117.                                                                                  
       18                                                                                                    
       19                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                                  
       20          The relevant portion of Appellant’s Specification reads as follows:                       
       21                Fluid flow connection means, for example one or more                                
       22          apertures, may be provided in the integrally formed wall means that                       
       23          separates the interior of balloon segment 236 and one or more of the                      
       24          adjacent, external lumens 242, 244 and 246. In this embodiment,                           
       25          instead of having coaxial inner sleeve 234, fluid may be supplied to                      
       26          balloon segment 236 through sleeve 232 and withdrawn through an                           
       27          externally extending adjacent, external lumen such as lumen 242.  As                      
       28          seen in Fig. 4, external, adjacent lumen 242 can be formed so as to run                   

                                                      3                                                      


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013