Appeal 2007-1594
Application 10/600,379
CONCLUSION OF LAW
The Examiner has not established that claims 1-3 lack novelty over Murray.
Likewise, the Examiner has not established that claims 4-10 are prima facie
obvious. On the other hand, the Examiner has established the prima facie
obviousness in claims 11-19. The § 112 rejection of claim 11 has been reversed.
A reversal and a new rejection of claims 20-22 pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §
41.50(b) under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, has been entered by the Board.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013