1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte SUSAN R. SANTOS, STEPHEN D. SIMON, and KAREN COX
12 ___________
13
14 Appeal 2007-1595
15 Application 09/751,858
16 Technology Center 3600
17 ___________
18
19 Decided: June 13, 2007
20 ___________
21
22 Before STUART S. LEVY, LINDA E. HORNER, and ANTON W. FETTING,
23 Administrative Patent Judges.
24 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
25 DECISION ON APPEAL
26
27
28 STATEMENT OF CASE
29 This appeal from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-21 and 27, the only
30 claims pending in this application, arises under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We have
31 jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
32
33 We REVERSE and ENTER A NEW GROUND OF REJECTION UNDER
34 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013