Ex Parte Santos et al - Page 16

            Appeal 2007-1595                                                                                 
            Application 09/751,858                                                                           

        1   claims 1, 7, 12, and 17 each require date gap analysis shown by Baum (FF17).                     
        2   Claim 1 and 7 require the ability to make workload adjustments and claims 12 and                 
        3   17 require the actual steps, contrasted with just the ability, of making workload                
        4   adjustments.  The ability to make any adjustments satisfies the requirements for                 
        5   claims 1 and 7, because in these claims workload adjustment is a field of use                    
        6   limitation, and were one to desire to make adjustments concerning workload, the                  
        7   capacity would exist as required in the claims.  As to actually making such                      
        8   adjustments in claims 12 and 17, this begs the question of what a workload                       
        9   adjustment is.  The Specification has provided an exemplary embodiment, but no                   
       10   lexicographic definition (FF04).  Absent a lexicographic definition, claim terms are             
       11   given their broadest reasonable interpretation to a person of ordinary skill, which              
       12   would be an adjustment bearing some relation to something that is characterized by               
       13   the load related to some form of work related to the data under analysis.  However,              
       14   Baum describes a statistical adjustment related to the number of machines that                   
       15   reasonably meets even the exemplary embodiment construction (FF19), and                          
       16   readily meets the broadest reasonable interpretation standard.  Both Jensen and Dix              
       17   show the independent claims’ control chart analysis (FF05 & 27).                                 
       18       Independent claim 1 and dependent claim 14 also require obtaining, formatting,               
       19   and storing data regarding nature, place, time and date for the analysis, which is               
       20   shown by Jensen (FF23).                                                                          
       21       The independent claims also require displaying the analysis.  The display of the             
       22   control chart analysis of both Jensen and Dix show that display of analysis is                   
       23   generally met, and the time gap analysis of Baum shows specific date gap analysis.               
       24   Although Baum’s chart does not show actual numbers along its X-axis, a person of                 
       25   ordinary skill would see that the actual time gaps are the implied values along that             

                                                     16                                                      


Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013