The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte RICHARD LOUIS ARNDT, PATRICK ALLEN BUCKLAND, GREGORY MICHAEL NORDSTROM, and STEVEN MARK THURBER __________ Appeal 2007-1597 Application 10/887,525 Technology Center 2100 __________ Decided: July 11, 2007 __________ Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, JEAN R. HOMERE, and ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges. COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-18. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013