The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte HIDEO SHIMAZAKI and YASUNORI IMAMOTO
____________
Appeal 2007-1676
Application 10/439,183
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: May 29, 2007
____________
Before , DONALD E. ADAMS, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and
RICHARD M. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 1-3, 5, 7, 11, and
14-16. Claims 9, 10, and 13 were withdrawn from consideration as drawn to
non-elected subject matter (Br. 41). Claims 4, 6, 8, 12, and 17 were
cancelled (Final Rejection 2). We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 See also, Non-Final Office Action 2, mailed December 14, 2004.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013