Ex Parte Burg et al - Page 1



                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    
                                                                                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                __________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                __________                                                   
                   Ex parte BERNARD JOSEPH BURG and CRAIG PETER SAYERS                                       
                                                __________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-1695                                                
                                          Application 10/418,835                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                                          Decided: July 30, 2007                                             
                                                __________                                                   
                Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and                                              
                ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
                COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the                         
                Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4, 6, 8-11, 13-16, and 18-20.  We have                      
                jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                                         
                      We AFFIRM-IN-PART.                                                                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013