The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte IL KWON SHIM, SHEILA MARIE L. ALVAREZ,
and VIRGIL COTOCO ARARAO
____________
Appeal 2007-1727
Application 10/836,916
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: September 25, 2007
____________
Before JOHN C. MARTIN, ANITA PELLMAN GROSS,
and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Shim, Alvarez, and Ararao (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 1, 3 through 8, 11 through 15,
and 18 through 20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013