Ex Parte Yamada - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-1733                                                                            
               Application 09/978,275                                                                      
                                              The Invention                                                
                      Appellant invented a method, apparatus, and computer-readable                        
               medium for suppressing noise in an input image signal representing a                        
               radiographic image by adapting the characteristic of a smoothing filter to the              
               characteristic of the input image signal. (Specification 5, Title and Abstract.)            
                      An understanding of the invention can be derived from exemplary                      
               independent claim 1, which reads as follows:                                                
                      1.  An apparatus for suppressing noise in an input image signal                      
                      representing a radiographic image, comprising:                                       
                      a smoothing unit which processes said input image signal by using a                  
                      smoothing filter so as to smooth said radiographic image; and                        
                      a characteristic calculation unit which obtains at least one first                   
                      characteristic of said input image signal by calculation using a                     
                      function based on first information indicating an exposure dose with                 
                      which said radiographic image has been produced;                                     
                      said smoothing unit adapts at least one second characteristic of the                 
                      smoothing filter to said input image signal based on said at least one               
                      first characteristic.                                                                
                      In rejecting the claims on appeal, the Examiner relies upon the                      
               following prior art:                                                                        
                  Wood       US 5,351,305   Sep. 27, 1994                                                  
                  Vuylsteke      US 5,461,655   Oct. 24, 1995                                              
                  Aach       US 6,173,084 B1  Jun.   9, 2001                                               
                      The Examiner rejects the claims on appeal as follows:                                
               A.    Claims 1 through 3, 7 through 13, 20, 21, and 37 through 41 stand                     
               rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Vuylsteke.                        



                                                    2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013