The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL E. BAZAKOS,
RIDHA M. HAMZA,
and DAVID W. MEYERS
____________
Appeal 2007-1736
Application 10/979,1291
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: August 6, 2007
____________
Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, JAY P. LUCAS,
and JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.
JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 1-3, 5-15, and 17-27.2 Claims 4 and 16 have been
1 This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. Application Ser. No.
10/655,124, filed Sept. 5, 2003, now U.S. Pat. 7,183,895 B2.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013