Appeal 2007-1736
Application 10/979,129
has established at least a prima facie case of obviousness for these claims on
Pages 14 and 15 of the Answer, and (2) Appellants have not persuasively
rebutted the Examiner's prima facie case, but merely noted that the addition
of Suzuki fails to cure the deficiencies of the other cited prior art in
connection with claim 17. For the reasons previously discussed, however,
the rejection is therefore sustained.
DECISION
We have sustained the Examiner's rejections with respect to all claims
on appeal. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-3, 5-15,
and 17-27 is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
AFFIRMED
KIS
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
101 COLUMBIA ROAD
P. O. BOX 2245
MORRISTOWN, NJ 07962-2245
11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Last modified: September 9, 2013