Appeal 2007-1755 Application 10/930,047 increases the cooling effect on brake elements (Answer 8). The issues before us are whether Appellants have shown that the Examiner erred in rejecting claims 1-4, 6-11, and 13-18 as unpatentable over Yasushi and Juhan, and claims 5, 12, and 19-23 as unpatentable over Yasushi, Juhan, and Sorrentino. FINDINGS OF FACT The relevant facts include the following: 1. Yasushi teaches a wheel 1 comprising a first rim 2a and a second rim 2b integrally formed in a parallel configuration on an outer periphery of a single wheel 1 (Yasushi, col. 2, ll. 35-37). 2. The wheel 1 includes a disc formed/mounted from/on an interior surface of the second rim 2b (Yasushi, Fig. 1). 3. The wheel structure of Yasushi comprises a space between the rim and the dual tires where snow, ice, or water could accumulate (Yasushi, Fig. 1). 4. The outermost portion of the wheel disc 1 is formed from/on an inwardly facing portion of the rim 2b which lies within the boundaries of the outermost limits of the rim 2b (Yasushi, Fig. 1). 5. Juhan teaches a wheel comprising a lateral disc 3 and at least two fitting rings 1a and 1b for pneumatic tires, mounted side by side on a single rim (Juhan, col. 1, ll. 8-10). 6. Each of the two fitting rings 1a and 1b are supported by a respective annular rim element 2a and 2b, concentrically disposed and formed with the wheel disc 3 (Juhan, col. 2, ll. 1-5). 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013