The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAN LINDSKOG, GUNNAR RYDNELL, and PER GRAPATIN
____________
Appeal 2007-1758
Application 10/004,786
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: August 30, 2007
____________
Before JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and JOHN A.
JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Final Rejection of
claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10-16, and 18-25. Claims 2, 4, 6, 9, and 17 have been
canceled. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
We reverse.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013