Ex Parte Lindskog et al - Page 7

              Appeal 2007-1758                                                                     
              Application 10/004,786                                                               
              disconnected from another mobile terminal, such a teaching does not                  
              overcome the deficiencies of Beach and van Bokhorst.  As discussed                   
              previously, there is no disclosure in Beach or van Bokhorst of a mobile              
              terminal making a request for a transition from a active state to a less active      
              state, a teaching which is also missing from Chen.                                   

                                          CONCLUSION                                               
                    In summary, we have not sustained the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
              rejections of any of the claims on appeal.  Therefore, the decision of the           
              Examiner rejecting claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10-16, and 18-25 is reversed.               

                                           REVERSED                                                









              rwk                                                                                  


              ERICSSON INC.                                                                        
              6300 LEGACY DRIVE                                                                    
              M/S EVR 1-C-11                                                                       
              PLANO TX 75024                                                                       




                                                7                                                  

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7

Last modified: September 9, 2013