Appeal 2007-1758
Application 10/004,786
disconnected from another mobile terminal, such a teaching does not
overcome the deficiencies of Beach and van Bokhorst. As discussed
previously, there is no disclosure in Beach or van Bokhorst of a mobile
terminal making a request for a transition from a active state to a less active
state, a teaching which is also missing from Chen.
CONCLUSION
In summary, we have not sustained the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
rejections of any of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the
Examiner rejecting claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10-16, and 18-25 is reversed.
REVERSED
rwk
ERICSSON INC.
6300 LEGACY DRIVE
M/S EVR 1-C-11
PLANO TX 75024
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013