The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CHAD A. COBBLEY and TIMOTHY L. JACKSON ____________ Appeal 2007-1772 Application 10/672,750 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Decided: August 22, 2007 ____________ Before CHUNG K. PAK, PETER F. KRATZ, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 35, 37-39, 45, 47-49, 63, 65-70, the only claims that remain pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013