Ex Parte Sallaway et al - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-1807                                                                            
               Application 09/751,037                                                                      


                                              The Invention                                                
                      Appellants invented a controller having an encoding portion and a                    
               decoding portion for monitoring and controlling the operating modes in a                    
               network transceiver.  (Specification 3.)                                                    
                      An understanding of the invention can be derived from exemplary                      
               independent claim 1, which reads as follows:                                                
                      1.  For use with a network transceiver having a decoder and an                       
                      encoder, a controller that controls operating modes of the network                   
                      transceiver, comprising:                                                             
                      an encoder portion operable to direct said encoder to encode data in                 
                      one of an industry-compliant mode and a custom mode; and                             
                      a decoder portion operable, in response to sensing data received in                  
                      said custom mode at said decoder, to direct:                                         
                            said decoder to decode said received data in said custom mode;                 
                            and                                                                            
                            said encoder portion to direct said encoder to encode data in                  
                            said custom mode.                                                              
                      In rejecting the claims on appeal, the Examiner relies upon the                      
               following prior art:                                                                        
               Herve   US 5,740,163   Apr. 14, 1998                                                        
               Agazzi  US 6,721,916 B2   Apr. 13, 2004                                                     
                                                                  (Filed May 15, 2001)                     
                      The Examiner rejects the claims on appeal as follows:                                
               A.  Claims 1 through 7, 9 through 16, 18 through 24, and 26 through 37                      
               stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Herve.                      


                                                    2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013