The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THEO PROLL, OTTO MACHHAMMER, GOTZ-PETER
SCHINDLER, and KLAUS JOACHIM MULLER-ENGEL
____________
Appeal 2007-18221
Application 10/482,191
Technology Center 1600
____________
Decided: August 20, 2007
____________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, LORA M. GREEN, and
NANCY J. LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
LINCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a 35 U.S.C. § 134 appeal in the above-referenced case.2
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse.
1 Heard, August 8, 2007.
2 The application was filed December 29, 2002. The real party in interest is
BASF Aktiengesellschaft.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013