The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL BECKER, FRANK BAHREN,
and ANDREAS STIEGLER
____________
Appeal 2007-1844
Application 10/012,200
Technology Center 2600
____________
Decided: October 4, 2007
____________
Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, JEAN R. HOMERE, and
ST JOHN COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 1 through 14. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b) to decide this appeal. We reverse.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013