Ex Parte Becker et al - Page 2

               Appeal 2007-1844                                                                             
               Application 10/012,200                                                                       
                                                  The Invention                                             
                      Appellants invented a vehicle multimedia system having multiple                       
               transceivers for communicating over a communication medium.                                  
               (Specification 1).                                                                           
                      An understanding of the invention can be derived from exemplary                       
               independent claim 1, which reads as follows:                                                 
                      1. A multimedia unit for use in a vehicle multimedia system that                      
                      includes a plurality of multimedia units connected to a ring-shaped                   
                      bus, said multimedia unit comprising a plurality a transceiver units                  
                      configured to communicate over the ring-shaped bus, wherein said                      
                      multimedia unit includes a network controller that controls the                       
                      communication of said plurality of transceiver units over the ring-                   
                      shaped bus.                                                                           

                      In rejecting the claims on appeal, the Examiner relies upon the                       
               following prior art:                                                                         
               Murakami   US 6,414,941 B1   Jul. 02, 2002                                                   
                                                                  Filed Apr. 20, 1999                       
                      The Examiner rejects the claims on appeal as follows:                                 
               Claims 1 through 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                         
               unpatentable over Murakami.                                                                  
                      Appellants contend that Murakami does not render claims 1 through                     
               14 unpatentable.  Particularly, Appellants contend that Murakami does not                    
               teach or suggest a multimedia unit that comprises a plurality of transceiver                 
               units, as recited in independent claims 1, 11, and 13.  (Br.6, Reply Br. 2).  In             
               response, the Examiner contends that Murakami’s teaching of a network                        
               node which comprises a first transceiver unit in the form of a                               
               receiver/transmitter means, and the network node further comprising a                        

                                                     2                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013