The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RUDIGER MUSCH, KNUT PANSKUS,
WOLFGANG HENNING, and HEINZ-WERNER LUCAS
________________
Appeal 2007-1850
Application 10/939,879
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: August 14, 2007
________________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CHUNG K. PAK, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-16. Claim 1 is
illustrative:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013