Appeal 2007-1850 Application 10/939,879 dispersion of Duan outweighs the evidence of unexpected results. In re May, 574 F.2d 1082, 1092, 197 USPQ 601, 609 (CCPA 1978); In re Nolan, 553 F.2d 1261, 1267, 193 USPQ 641, 645 (CCPA 1977). Indeed, as acknowledged by Appellants, “the prior art suggests the addition of an aqueous silicon dioxide dispersion to any emulsion latex polymer” (Br. 7, last para.). In conclusion, based on the foregoing, it is our judgment that the evidence of obviousness presented by the Examiner outweighs any evidence of nonobviousness proffered by Appellants. Accordingly, the Examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv). AFFIRMED clj Bayer Material Science LLC 100 Bayer Road Pittsburgh, PA 15205 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013