Ex Parte Bufkin - Page 1



                                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                            
                                    is not binding precedent of the Board.                                      

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                               _____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                               _____________                                                    
                                       Ex parte WILLIAM J. BUFKIN                                               
                                               _____________                                                    
                                              Appeal 2007-1857                                                  
                                           Application 10/724,958                                               
                                           Technology Center 3600                                               
                                                ____________                                                    
                                          Decided: August 24, 2007                                              
                                              _______________                                                   
                Before TERRY J. OWENS, LINDA E. HORNER, and                                                     
                ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
                OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             

                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       The Appellant appeals from a rejection of claims 1-10 and 12-20.                         
                Claim 11, which is the only other pending claim, stands objected to by the                      
                Examiner as dependent from a rejected claim but allowable if rewritten in                       
                independent form.                                                                               
                                              THE INVENTION                                                     
                       The Appellant claims an integrated arm support and mouse table for                       
                attachment to a chair armrest.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                        




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013