Ex Parte Bufkin - Page 4


                Appeal 2007-1857                                                                                
                Application 10/724,958                                                                          

                platform (120) extending therefrom that conforms to the palm of the user’s                      
                hand (col. 9, ll. 12-24, 53-58).                                                                
                       Wu discloses an adjustable armrest having a rotatable pad (4)                            
                disposed on a recess portion (12) of an armrest seat (1) (col. 2, ll. 22-23).                   
                       Roberts discloses an armrest that is attached to the arm of a chair                      
                using brackets (18) and, optionally, straps (20) (col. 1, ll. 61-67).                           
                       Dearing discloses an armchair having a writing tablet (16) with a flat                   
                recess (64) in its upper surface for supporting a computer mouse pad (26)                       
                (col. 3, ll. 48-50; fig. 2).                                                                    
                                               Claims 1 and 17                                                  
                       The Appellant argues that Wilson’s concave-shaped saddle is not                          
                shaped to receive a forearm of the user (Br. 10). 1  Wilson’s disclosure that                   
                the concave portion of the saddle is formed in such a way that it cradles the                   
                user’s forearm and prevents the user’s forearm from falling off (col. 4, ll. 43-                
                46; col. 9, ll. 8-12, 59-64) indicates that the concave portion is shaped to                    
                receive a user’s forearm.                                                                       
                       We therefore are not convinced of reversible error in the rejection of                   
                claim 1.  Accordingly, we affirm the rejection of that claim and claim 17 that                  
                stands or falls therewith (Br. 7).                                                              



                                    Claims 2, 4, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20                                    

                                                                                                               
                1 The pages in the Brief are unnumbered.  The page numbers referred to                          
                herein have been provided by the Board.                                                         

                                                       4                                                        

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013