Ex Parte Deng - Page 2

                Appeal 2007-1864                                                                              
                Application 10/100,717                                                                        
                                                                                                             
                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  
                      Appellant invented a speech recognition method with improved                            
                capability to recognize, among other things, hypo-articulated and hyper-                      
                articulated speech.  Specifically, a predicted speech value for a hypothesis                  
                speech unit is determined using an articulatory dynamics value.  In one                       
                embodiment, the articulatory dynamics value depends on such a value at a                      
                previous time and an articulation target.  In another embodiment, the                         
                articulatory dynamics value depends in part on acoustic environmental                         
                values, such as noise and distortion values.  And in another embodiment, a                    
                time constant that defines the articulatory dynamics values is trained using a                
                variety of articulation styles.1  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                    
                      1.  A method of speech recognition, the method comprising:                              
                      receiving an observable value that describes a portion of a speech                      
                signal;                                                                                       
                      identifying a predicted value for a hypothesis phonological unit using                  
                an articulatory dynamics value that depends on an articulatory dynamics                       
                value at a previous time and an articulation target; and                                      
                      comparing the observed value to the predicted value to determine a                      
                likelihood for the hypothesis phonological unit.                                              
                      The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference to show                        
                unpatentability:                                                                              
                Hutchins                  US 4,980,917               Dec. 25, 1990                            



                                                                                                             
                1 See generally Specification 2:1 - 4:12.                                                     
                                                      2                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013