Appeal 2007-1867
Application 09/864,113
1 U.S.C. § 102(b), or claims 2, 5-7, 11, 14-16, 20, and 23-25 under 35 U.S.C.
2 § 103(a) as unpatentable over the prior art.
3 On this record, the Appellants are not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-
4 27.
5
6 DECISION
7 To summarize, our decision is as follows:
8 • The rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 8-10, 12, 13, 17-19, 21, 22, 26, and 27 under
9 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Odigo.com as evidenced by Surfing
10 and Odigo.com web pages is sustained.
11 • The rejection of claims 2, 5, 6, 11, 14, 15, 20, 23, and 24 under 35 U.S.C. §
12 103(a) as unpatentable over Odigo.com and Tang is sustained.
13 • The rejection of claims 7, 16, and 25 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
14 unpatentable over Odigo and Kenney is sustained.
15 No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
16 may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv).
17 AFFIRMED
18
19 jlb19
20 IBM Corporation (RHF)
21 C/O Robert H. Frantz
22 P.O. Box 23324
23 Oklahoma City, OK 73123
24
15
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: September 9, 2013