The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent
of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MATTHIAS J. SCHMAND, LARS A. ERIKSSON, NIRAJ K. DOSHI,
MEHMET AYKAC, and RONALD NUTT
_____________
Appeal 2007-1868
Application 10/441,682
Technology Center 2800
______________
Decided: September 26, 2007
_______________
Before JOSEPH L. DIXON MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and ROBERT E. NAPPI,
Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Final Rejection of
claims 1 through 18. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). For the
reasons stated infra, we affirm the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013